Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] rebase: write better reflog messages

Junio C Hamano wrote:

So you are forcing people to maintain _two_ variables, instead of
just _one_, without making anything simpler.

What's so hard to understand why it is a wrong design?

Fine.  Let's say I buy your argument about one-variable versus
two-variables: how do you solve the existing problems that are solved
by overriding GIT_REFLOG_ACTION that I pointed out?

If you truly think this is "inconsequential", that unfortunately
convinces me that you cannot yet be trusted enough to give you
latitude to design interfaces that span multiple programs X-<.

*shrug* I certainly don't think one-variable versus two-variables
warrants this much discussion.

I don't have anything to win or lose: I designed a solution to the
problem which I think is reasonable; you don't.  Fine.  Show me an
alternative that doesn't involve rewriting half of the rebase
infrastructure in a series that fixes checkout-dash.