Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Reroll patches against v1.8.3.1

Alexey Shumkin [off-list ref] writes:

Alexey Shumkin (5):
  t6006 (rev-list-format): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs
  t7102 (reset): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs
  t4205 (log-pretty-formats): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs
  pretty: Add failing tests: user format ignores i18n.logOutputEncoding
    setting
  pretty: user format ignores i18n.logOutputEncoding setting

Next time, please jog readers' memory better by giving a bit more
descriptive cover letter.  "Reroll" is known by "v5" alrady, and
"against v1.8.3.1" certainly helps, but what this series is about is
unclear, especially because the end-game patch "user format ignores"
is rather badly stated.  It is unclear if it is a good thing that
user format ignores it and the patch makes sure that is the case, if
we currently ignore it in user format and the patch fixes it by
making user format pay attention to it, etc.

Thanks.

 builtin/reset.c                  |   8 +-
 builtin/rev-list.c               |   1 +
 builtin/shortlog.c               |   1 +
 log-tree.c                       |   1 +
 submodule.c                      |   3 +
 t/t4041-diff-submodule-option.sh |  25 +++--
 t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh    | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh       | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 t/t7102-reset.sh                 |  37 ++++++-
 9 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)