Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:
Phil Hord wrote:
quoted
I share your disdain for the bare '40's in the code. But I think this
code is less clear than the previous version with the magic number.
Please read the cover-letter:
Which was...
quoted
[1/2] is important. [2/2] is a minor prettification, that wouldn't
have been possible without [1/2].
...and I do not find how the above is connected with
I was just toying around to see if this
was a good idea,...
...this in any way. Puzzled.