Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

Conveniently enough we have seen both already ;-)  Andrew's version for
commit.c could use a bit of refactorization, since it inserts the same
code in two places, but then it's about the same complexity as the
change for rebase.

I'm not sure it's worth arguing about whether the "fixup! fixup!"  is a
symptom of some underlying problem, and changing rebase is only tapering
over the symptom; or whether it's actually a useful distinction.

If they are about the same complexity, then my instict tells me that
it is a better design not to strip on the writing side.

Thanks.