Re: [PATCH 5/6] status: do not depend on flaky reflog messages

Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I have been assuming the "main" thing Duy wanted to do was the last
test (and the one below), but was this meant as an improvement for
"git status" output during that state?

On what basis are you making that assumption? 

List archive helps.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/217342/focus=217444

Not just that single message, but a few messages in the discussion
that led to the design shows that we wanted both "at" and "from" to
mean something sensible, when a "checkout" initiated by the end-user
detached HEAD and we are not on any branch, even after making
commits or doing resets.