Re: git stash while pending merge should not be allowed

On 06/07/13 11:47, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Scott McPeak [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I suggest that this problem could easily have been avoided if "git
stash" refused to run with a pending merge (present MERGE_HEAD file),
since this is crucial repository state that it does not save.  This
seems similar to what "git cherry-pick" does.

Sounds senslbe.  What do we want to see happen in other states, in
which Git gives control back to the user asking for help before
moving forward (e.g. am, rebase, cherry-pick, revert)?

If you're asking me, I don't know.  My first thought is if there is any 
pending state that "stash" doesn't save, stash should refuse to run. 
But I don't know know very much about some of those commands.

-Scott