Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Move copy_note_for_rewrite + friends from builtin/notes.c to notes-utils.c

From: Johan Herland <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:43

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Felipe Contreras
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Johan Herland [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Johan Herland [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This is a pure code movement of the machinery for copying notes to
rewritten objects. This code was located in builtin/notes.c for
historical reasons. In order to make it available to builtin/commit.c
it was declared in builtin.h. This was more of an accident of history
than a concious design, and we now want to make this machinery more
widely available.

Hence, this patch moves the code into the new notes-utils.[hc] files
which are included into libgit.a. Except for adjusting #includes
accordingly, this patch merely moves the relevant functions verbatim
into the new files.

Cc: Thomas Rast <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <redacted>
I wonder where you got that idea from. Did you come up with that out thin air?
Obviously not. I should add

Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
You are still not explaining where the idea came from. And you are
doing that with the express purpose of annoying.
Truly, I am not trying to annoy anyone. I have not followed the
preceding discussion closely, and I wrote the patch based solely on
one paragraph from Junio's email[1].
Where did the idea come from?
I got it from Junio. I do not know if I might have accidentally
plagiarized something you already submitted to the mailing list,
although I would be surprised if that was the case, since - as far as
I understand - you are opposed to this solution. Furthermore, I
thought you might not like having your name mentioned in a patch you
do not agree with, but if you think differently I have no problem
adding your name. I don't know what kind of attribution you would
prefer though:

Originally-envisioned-by: Felipe Contreras [off-list ref]?
NAKed-by: Felipe Contreras [off-list ref]?
Something else?


...Johan


[1]: Quoted from [ref]:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:
There is only one right solution.  If a useful function is buried in
builtin/*.o as a historical accident (i.e. it started its life as a
helper for that particular command, and nobody else used it from
outside so far) and that makes it impossible to use the function
from outside builtin/*.o, refactor the function and its callers and
move it to libgit.a.
-- 
Johan Herland, [off-list ref]
www.herland.net
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help