Thread (73 messages) flat view 73 messages, 8 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v4 45/45] tests: update topology tests

From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:41

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Felipe Contreras
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <redacted>
---
 t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh b/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh
index 5400a05..96cc479 100755
--- a/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh
+++ b/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh
@@ -70,9 +70,8 @@ test_run_rebase () {
                test_linear_range "\'"$expected"\'" d..
        "
 }
-#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase
-test_run_rebase success 'e n o' ''
-test_run_rebase success 'e n o' -m
+test_run_rebase success 'n o e' ''
+test_run_rebase success 'n o e' -m
 test_run_rebase success 'n o e' -i
If you do end up re-sending the series on top of my series, I'd prefer
to see the end result having the first argument inlined, so these few
lines become simply:
Somebody else would need to do that, there's no point in me sending
these patches, just to increase the number of my patches that get
completely ignored by Junio.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help