Re: [PATCH] build: get rid of the notion of a git library
From: John Keeping <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:38
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:13:41PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
John Keeping wrote:quoted
Calling across from one builtin/*.c file to another is just as wrong as calling into a builtin/*.c file from a top-level file but the build system happens not to enforce the former.So libgit.a is a collection of everything that is shared between builtins? Does that correspond to reality?
I think that's *precisely* what libgit.a is. It doesn't currently correspond exactly to reality, but that's mostly for historic reasons (see below).
quoted
$ ls *.h | sed 's/.h$/.c/' | xargs file An example violation: builtin/log.c uses functions defined in builtin/shortlog.c. What is the point of all this separation, if no external scripts are ever going to use libgit.a?
Why do we structure code in a certain way at all? The reason libgit.a
was introduced (according to commit 0a02ce7) is:
This introduces the concept of git "library" objects that
the real programs use, and makes it easier to add such
things to a "libgit.a".
And all the functions should be static, which doesn't seem to be the case: 00000000000003c0 T add_files_to_cache 0000000000000530 T interactive_add 0000000000000410 T run_add_interactive 0000000000001920 T textconv_object 00000000000005b0 T fmt_merge_msg 0000000000000090 T fmt_merge_msg_config 0000000000000c00 T init_db 0000000000000b40 T set_git_dir_init 0000000000000360 T overlay_tree_on_cache 0000000000000500 T report_path_error 00000000000011a0 T copy_note_for_rewrite 0000000000001210 T finish_copy_notes_for_rewrite 0000000000001060 T init_copy_notes_for_rewrite 0000000000000000 T prune_packed_objects 0000000000000510 T shortlog_add_commit 00000000000006b0 T shortlog_init 0000000000000780 T shortlog_output 0000000000000000 T stripspace
A quick check with "git log -S..." shows that most of these have barely been touched since the builtin/ directory was created. So the reason they're not static is most likely because no one has tidied them up since the division between builtins was introduced. It is a fact of life that as we live and work with a system we realise that there may be a better way of doing something. This doesn't mean that someone needs to immediately convert everything to the new way, it is often sufficient to do new things in the new way and slowly move existing things across as and when they are touched for other reasons.