Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] cherry-pick: add --skip-empty option

Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Pretty much what it says on the tin.

And a bit more, isn't it?

The --keep-redundant-commits option implies the --allow-empty option
and it was perfectly acceptable to give both.  By making sure that
only at most one of -k-r-d, -a-e or -s-e is given, this forbids that
usage.

"It is implied so there is no *need* to give it redundantly" is
different from "It is implied so you shouldn't give it redundantly".

Remove that line then.

quoted

Like 7 and 8 that adds --quiet/--skip, don't we want this also for
revert?

If we don't want --allow-empty in revert, we don't want --skip-empty
either. That is a separate patch.

OK.