On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:
Am 6/4/2013 7:14, schrieb Martin von Zweigbergk:
quoted
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+
+# checks that the revisions in "$2" represent a linear range with the
+# subjects in "$1"
+test_linear_range () {
+ ! { git log --format=%p "$2" | sane_grep " " ;} &&
An interesting way to spell:
test $(git rev-list --merges "$2" | wc -l) = 0
Heh, true. I'll change that.
Then I think it would be even better written as
revlist_merges=$(git rev-list --merges "$2") &&
test -z "$revlist_merges"
so as not to ignore errors in the git invocation (and at least one less
fork()).
Done. I'll send it out in a day or two.