Re: can we prevent reflog deletion when branch is deleted?
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:31
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 05:00:07AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
This is a known problem. The technical reason that this is not trivial to solve is the possibility of a directory/file conflict between old reflog files and references that might be created subsequently (which in turn is a limitation of how loose references and reflogs are mapped to filenames): [...] Peff proposed a solution to this problem [1], but AFAIK it is not making progress.
I was running with the patch series you mentioned for a while, but there are some weird bugs with it that need to be tracked down. I don't recall the details, but I would occasionally get error messages that showed that some parts of the code were surprised that the reflog existed without the ref existing. While I think solving the D/F conflict in the ref namespaces overall would be a nice thing to have, doing it with compatibility with the current system is complex and error-prone. I wonder if simply sticking the reflog entries into a big GRAVEYARD reflog wouldn't be a great deal simpler and accomplish the "keep deleted reflogs" goal, which is what people actually want. -Peff