Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixing volatile HEAD in push.default = current

Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:

We're at 1.8.3; isn't it a little early to be thinking of 2.0?  Is it
conflicting with jc/push-2.0-default-to-simple in pu?  I should
re-send after this topic graduates to master in 2.0?

I implicitly asked you not to ask as I do not even have to worry
about conflicts ;-)  That does not mean I'll discard.  Please ping
me back later after 1.8.3 if you do not see it in my tree anywhere;
I may have found time to splice these _before_ the 2.0 patch (which
is where it should come, I think) by then.