Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] push: add separate 'downstream' branch
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:16
Felipe Contreras wrote:
And is going to change soon.
Your point being? How will this patch interact with push.default = matching?
quoted
branch.<name>.push should probably be named branch.<name>.downstreamref and be used only for informational purposes (@{d} and git status)?That makes absolutely no sense.
I said downstreamref, not downstreamrefspec.
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/master
pushremote = github
push = refs/heads/fc/master
[branch "fc/old-remote/hg"]
remote = .
merge = refs/heads/master
pushremote = github
push = refs/heads/fc/remote/hg
Tell me how you express that without 'remote.branch.push'.
[remote "origin"]
push = refs/heads/master:refs/heads/fc/master
[remote "."]
push = refs/heads/fc/old-remote/hg:refs/heads/fc/remote/hg
Advantage being you can do:
[remote "origin"]
push = refs/heads/*:refs/for/*
While you can't with branch.<name>.push.