Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2] make color.ui default to 'auto'

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:16

Matthieu Moy [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Matthieu Moy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
diff --git a/builtin/config.c b/builtin/config.c
index 000d27c..ecfceca 100644
--- a/builtin/config.c
+++ b/builtin/config.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static void get_color(const char *def_color)
 
 static int get_colorbool_found;
 static int get_diff_color_found;
-static int get_color_ui_found;
+static int get_color_ui_found = GIT_COLOR_AUTO;
It is curious to notice that we have these three and only one is
initialized to the new default value, while the other two get -1
at the beginning of get_colorbool().
Right. The meaning of the _found suffix is clear for the first two, but
not the last.
quoted
I wonder if it would be cleaner to statically initialize all three
to -1 here, drop the assignment of -1 to two of them from the
beginning of get_colorbool(), and then have a final fallback inside
the want_color() call itself, i.e.
I've left the assignments within the function (I like the initialisation
right before usage, I don't have to worry about how many times the
function is called then), but I've added a patch that initializes
get_color_ui_found to -1 like the others, and does essentially this:
quoted
	get_colorbool_found = want_color(get_colorbool_found < 0
        				? GIT_COLOR_AUTO
                                        : get_colorbool_found);
Except I've made it a separate if statement. Then PATCH 2/2 is really
crystal clear.
Yeah, sounds good.
Reroll comming, with an improved commit message that should adress the
points in the other message.
Hmm, I don't see much improvement in the message, though.  It seems
to talk about "may not discover", "live with", "a few people", and
"they can easily", none of which should be there.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help