Re: [PATCH] diffcore-pickaxe doc: document -S and -G properly
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:15
Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Any time you say "This means that", "More precisely", etc. please check if you can rewrite it to lose everything before them (i.e. a vague sentence that needs to be clarified may not have to be there at all).Right. I thought both are necessary in this case: the first sentence gives easy information to a first-timer. For someone who has played with it a bit, and wants to know more: the second line.quoted
quoted
++ +It is often useful when you're looking for an exact string (like a +function prototype), and want to know the history of that string since +it first came into being.I think you should remind that the most useful case (and indeed the intended one) is for "an exact string" to be a multi-line "block of text". People often get a (wrong) impression from the word "string" that it is meant to be used with a single-liner.Yes, I've been meaning to discuss that. I've been having some trouble with multi-line strings: zsh doesn't insert a TAB in the next line. The workaround I have is to write a shell script and execute that. How do you do it?
I do not use zsh but with bash+readline the old tradition lnext can be used (see "stty -a" output and it typically is set to ^V), i.e. \C-v followed by \C-i should give you a literal HT.