Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Felipe Contreras
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
It is just the "strip this, strip that" explanation, which is not
technically correct, does _not_ have to be our justification for
picking '@' as a short-hand for HEAD.
The point is that it follows from @something -> @.
So my proposal is:
---
Typing 'HEAD' is tedious, especially when we can use '@' instead.
The reason for choosing '@' is that it follows naturally from the
ref@op syntax (e.g. HEAD@{u}), except we have no ref, and no
operation, and when we don't have those, it makes sens to assume
'HEAD'.
After this patch, we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness.
That reads much better.