Re: [PATCH v2] sha1_name: reorganize get_sha1_basic()
From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:07
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:quoted
[...]Okay, you used nth_prior in this one.quoted
There is no need to call this function recursively with the branch of @{-N} substituted because dwim_{ref,log} already replaces it.I figured that the recursion is because dwim_{ref,log} didn't exist when this was written.
They did, but they were not substituting the branches.
quoted
@@ -447,6 +448,10 @@ static int get_sha1_basic(const char *str, int len, unsigned char *sha1) if (len && str[len-1] == '}') { for (at = len-2; at >= 0; at--) { if (str[at] == '@' && str[at+1] == '{') { + if (at == 0 && str[2] == '-') { + nth_prior = 1; + continue; + }Looking at this closely once again. You've already hit the beginning. What are you continuing? Take the example of a compound expression with @{-
Yeah, we could break, but I would prefer the break to happen naturally when in the for loop check.
On another note, I think you've fixed a bug: @{-1}{0} was parsing to
the same value as @{-1}@{0} before your patch.Yeap.
quoted
@@ -460,20 +465,22 @@ static int get_sha1_basic(const char *str, int len, unsigned char *sha1) if (len && ambiguous_path(str, len)) return -1; - if (!len && reflog_len) { + if (nth_prior) {nth_prior makes this much cleaner overall.quoted
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; - int ret; - /* try the @{-N} syntax for n-th checkout */ - ret = interpret_branch_name(str+at, &buf); - if (ret > 0) { - /* substitute this branch name and restart */ - return get_sha1_1(buf.buf, buf.len, sha1, 0); - } else if (ret == 0) { - return -1; + int detached; + + if (interpret_nth_prior_checkout(str, &buf) > 0) { + detached = (buf.len == 40 && !get_sha1_hex(buf.buf, sha1)); + strbuf_release(&buf); + if (detached) + return 0;Neat. I'd set reflog_len to zero and made sure that the last part of the function wouldn't be executed. How did you get away without setting refs_found to 1 though?
The rest of the code is not executed, there's no need if @{-N}
evaluates to a SHA-1. There's no ref to dwim, and there's no reflog
anyway. We just fetch the SHA-1 and return.
quoted
} + } + + if (!len && reflog_len) /* allow "@{...}" to mean the current branch reflog */ refs_found = dwim_ref("HEAD", 4, sha1, &real_ref);I got this part wrong too: I said dwim_log() instead of dwim_ref().
Fortunately we are not changing the code this time, which is the best way to make sure that the behavior doesn't change. It took me a long time to play with alternatives and find a clean solution with minimal changes that is easy to understand, but I think this code does the trick. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras