Re: [PATCH 1/9] remote-bzr: trivial cleanups
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:01
[completely off-topic; don't worry, we're just having a friendly chat] Felipe Contreras wrote:
If you are not prepared to defend your review, so are others, why to you blame that on me? If you were right, you would be shown to be right. Period.
Felipe, there are some things that are worth arguing about for a long time (like the new revision spec I'm proposing in [1]), and others that are not. [1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/222248/focus=222526
No, we operate in evidence and reason, *not* opinion. Any reasonable person would say "well, I *think* this commit message needs more description, but I don't *know*, I don't have *evidence* for it, so I'm not going to fight to the death, as if I had".
Don't you think you're taking reason to an extreme here? Reason is a tool that I use when I want. I don't want reason when I'm browsing Google Art Project or listening to Gentle Giant. Arguments like "is this commit message large enough?" are really not worth the time and effort.
Ultimately the decision to merge or not to merge comes to Junio, if you don't like his decision, go complain to him, but I would be prepared with points in time where people complained about these patches, and there are no complains, so you have no ammunition at all whatsoever.
I have no desire to "attack" you, Felipe. I respect you as a more experienced developer than myself, and am trying to offer constructive criticism. I don't have an ego (or consider myself important to the community). Whatever will happen will happen, with or without me.
And this is how communities die. When everybody thinks the same, and everyone who thinks differently is displaced. A monoculture, a place full of yes-men where nobody criticizes anybody, a circlejerk where everyone palms the back of everyone else. Eventually things go south, and nobody around you understands why. Diversity in a community is healthy. If you don't like people who think differently, *you* have a problem. If you don't like standing up and defending your ideas, *you* have a problem. If you don't like discussing on the basis of evidence and reason, *you* have a problem.
Diversity is certainly healthy, and I it would be nice to have you in the community. We just have to find a way to keep the conflict down.