Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] check-non-portable-shell: Check for non portable grep usage

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:00

Torsten Bögershausen [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
The make test-lint could check for some common non portable
grep usage:

The + as a qualifier is not a "basic regular expression".
Some grep understand \+, but in general egrep should be used.

The \t can not be used to find an ASCII TAB, neither
can \s be used to find a whitespace

Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <redacted>
---
 t/check-non-portable-shell.pl | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl b/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl
index ff87611..58f8e2c 100755
--- a/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl
+++ b/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ sub err {
 
 while (<>) {
 	chomp;
+	/ e?grep\s+\"[^"]*\\([st])/ and err "grep \\$1 is not portable)";
grep -e "foo\tbar" is exempt?  Indenting with a single tab,
immediately followed by "grep" or "egrep" without SP in front, is
exempt?
+	/ [^e]grep.*\\\+/ and err 'grep with \+ is not portable (please use egrep)';
Not even checking if the it is inside the pattern of grep?

As I said number of times, I do not think it is a workable approach
to textually match patterns in a script that does not understand
even the basic shell syntax.
 	/^\s*sed\s+-i/ and err 'sed -i is not portable';
 	/^\s*echo\s+-(\S)\s+/ and err "echo -$1 is not portable (please use printf)";
 	/^\s*declare\s+/ and err 'arrays/declare not portable';
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help