Re: [PATCH 4/5] git-log.txt: rewrite note on why "--" may be required

Junio C Hamano wrote:

I think "branch names" was an attempt to make it more newbie
friendly by sacrificing technical accuracy.  With the suggested
update (see the review for the previous one), it would be easier to
read if this part said "options or the revision range".

Why does it have to be a range?  It might well be a list of revisions,
so I'm tempted to stick with the word "revisions".  As I wrote in the
previous email, I think "revision" can be referenced by any one of the
syntaxes specified in revisions.txt (this includes a "committish
range").