Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
The risk of actually closing the door for future developers. That
is a downside of this patch, if we were to apply it.
Okay, no issues. Drop it.
Consider documenting the fact that IS_STASH_LIKE is merely a
contextual synonym for IS_MERGE_COMMIT somewhere though.
Documenting what IS_STASH_LIKE means and what it is meant to be used
for would add a lot of value, if it is not done already, but I doubt
it adds much value to document that it _happens to be implemented_
as "is it a merge commit?" in the current version.