Re: [Resend PATCH] t3903 (stash): add failing test for ref of form ^{/message}

Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

I do not think anybody considered the approach to look at the commit
object name and making sure it appears in the reflog that implements
the stash. It sounds like a more robust check if done right.

Actually, if you think about it, there is really only one way to
specify revisions in the stash's reflog: stash@*.
...
* although I'd have been more comfortable if we had a neater way to specify that

Yup.  "git stash pop +4", without a must-be-it token "stash" or
mandatory "@{}" frill would have been much nicer.