Re: [PATCH 2/2] transport-helper: update remote helper namespace

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Just rerolling with what _you_ think is an appropriate level of
explanation (either or both in log and in-code) and see what happens
would probably be the best way to proceed, I think, at this
point. Either you hear "It still is wrong and too sketchy", "Yeah,
thinking about it again, this is sufficient" from others.  Or a
silent, which I am inclined to take as much closer to the latter
after all the discussion.

For future reference, sometimes when I am silent it does not mean
agreement but means "I am fed up and don't consider it to be worth the
drain on my energy to deal with this mess."  Which is pretty close to
"let's move on; this is sufficient", yes.

Thanks,
Jonathan