Thread (66 messages) flat view 66 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v1 23/45] check-ignore: convert to use parse_pathspec

From: Adam Spiers <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:48

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 01:06:38PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
check-ignore (at least the test suite) seems to rely on the pattern
order. PATHSPEC_KEEP_ORDER is introduced to explictly express this.
The lack of PATHSPEC_MAXDEPTH_VALID is sufficient because it's the
only flag that reorders pathspecs, but it's less obvious that way.
Sorry for the slow response - I only just noticed this today.  (It
would be useful if any future patches to check-ignore Cc: me
explicitly, to catch my mail filters.)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <redacted>
---
 builtin/check-ignore.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 pathspec.c             |  6 +++++-
 pathspec.h             |  1 +
 t/t0008-ignores.sh     |  8 ++++----
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/check-ignore.c b/builtin/check-ignore.c
index 0240f99..6e55f06 100644
--- a/builtin/check-ignore.c
+++ b/builtin/check-ignore.c
@@ -53,14 +53,14 @@ static void output_exclude(const char *path, struct exclude *exclude)
 	}
 }
 
-static int check_ignore(const char *prefix, const char **pathspec)
+static int check_ignore(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 {
 	struct dir_struct dir;
-	const char *path, *full_path;
 	char *seen;
 	int num_ignored = 0, dtype = DT_UNKNOWN, i;
 	struct path_exclude_check check;
 	struct exclude *exclude;
+	struct pathspec pathspec;
 
 	/* read_cache() is only necessary so we can watch out for submodules. */
 	if (read_cache() < 0)
@@ -70,31 +70,39 @@ static int check_ignore(const char *prefix, const char **pathspec)
 	dir.flags |= DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED;
 	setup_standard_excludes(&dir);
 
-	if (!pathspec || !*pathspec) {
+	if (!argc) {
Is there a compelling reason for introducing argc as a new parameter
to check_ignore(), other than simplifying the above line?  And why
rename the pathspec parameter to argv?  Both these changes are
misleading AFAICS, since paths provided to check_ignore() can come
from sources other than CLI arguments (i.e. via --stdin).  

The introduction of argc also makes it possible to invoke
check_ignore() with arguments which are not self-consistent.

I haven't been following your pathspec work, but FWIW the other
changes in this patch look reasonable at a glance.

Thanks,
Adam
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help