Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] Documentation: add caveats about I/O buffering for check-{attr,ignore}

Adam Spiers [off-list ref] writes:

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:09:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Reflowing of the text is very much unappreciated X-<.  

I very much appreciate the excellent job you do as maintainer; your
attention to detail results in an incredibly high quality project.
However I do occasionally find your communication style unnecessarily
abrasive.  Maybe that's just me.

Sorry for being me X-<.  Yeah, I agree that the above came out to be
more blunt than needed.

It is usually OK to re-flow the text in the paragraph you are
touching. After all, for the purpose of reviewing, people can just
blindly apply and then ask "diff --color-words".  In this case,
however, there was some changes that conflict in the vicinity, and
reflowing made the resolution unnecessarily more cumbersome.

I have briefly looked at this series, but it severely conflicts with
a few topics in flight that touch the infrastructure you are using,
so I haven't merged it to 'pu'. Perhaps after things calm down, we
may want to ask you to reroll on top of updated codebase.

Thanks.