Thread (33 messages) flat view 33 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote

From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:46

Jeff King wrote:
It's not that it's not potentially useful. It's that it may be
surprising and annoying to users who did not want that.
... but this is a new syntax, and doesn't break any existing
expectations.  Why are you imagining what users will expect with a git
push -- master next; that hasn't been invented yet?  From "matching"?
 But we've made it very clear that it's going to change soon.  Users
can still use the git push origin master next; form as usual.  In my
opinion, this new syntax is incredibly useful if users set pushremote
properly.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help