Re: RFC: allowing multiple parallel sequencers

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:06:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Neil Horman [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

	I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best to
do it.... The thoughts I had were:

1) A per branch sequence directory...
2) Augment the git-stash command...

3) A per branch working tree.

That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-)

Not sure I completely follow.  Are you suggesting that all untracked
files, indexes and meta data in .git be saved during a branch switch?

Thanks
Neil