Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows

Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

[...]

Thanks.  That is one of the reasons why we do not want to see too
many custom test helper functions.

I noticed that you queued my original series without modification in
rr/triangle.  Should I submit a re-roll with Peff's suggestion
incorporated?

If you want the topic to make progress, yes.

The only reason a topic is queued in 'pu' is to let me not pay
attention to it, without risking to forget about it completely ;-).

The topics on 'pu' have potential to be a useful change even though
they are far from ready for 'next'.  By queuing on 'pu', rather than
just letting them sit in the mail archive and relying on the author
to send follow-ups, I can send out "what happened to this topic?"
inquiries from time to time, without paying constant attention to
them.