Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

Philip Oakley wrote:

From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <redacted>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:44 PM

quoted

This follows-up [1], with three important differences:

1. pushremote_get() and remote_get() share code better.  Thanks Jeff.

2. All spelling mistakes have been corrected.  Thanks Eric.

3. One new test for each of the new configuration variables.  The
extra two parts [2/6] and [3/6] preprare the file for introducing
tests.  However, I've not gone overboard in this preparation; I don't
replicate the work done by Jonathan in [2].

Thanks for reading.

[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/218410
[2]:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/218451/focus=218465

Ramkumar Ramachandra (6):
 remote.c: simplify a bit of code using git_config_string()
 t5516 (fetch-push): update test description
 t5516 (fetch-push): introduce mk_test_with_name()
 remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/push
 remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault
 remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremote

Documentation/config.txt | 23 +++++++++++++++---

Shouldn't Documentation/gitworkflows.txt also be updated with the triangular
workflow and its configuration?

Currently, Documentation/gitworkflows.txt makes no effort to explain
how to set up configuration variables for centralized or distributed
workflows.  I don't see how I could patch the existing document to
include this workflow, without changing the entire structure of the
document (left as an exercise for future patches).