On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
git-hash-object(1) implies that it will apply the clean filter and EOL
conversion when it's given a path to a file in the working tree (as it
is here). Is that not the case?
Applying clean to smudged contents _ought to_ recover clean version,
but is that "ought to" something you would want to rely on?
How does git-status figure out that file that has been touch'd does not
have unstaged changes without relying on this? Surely this case is no
different from that?
John