Re: [PATCH/RFC] Make help behaviour more consistent

"Philip Oakley" [off-list ref] writes:

From: "Junio C Hamano" <redacted>

quoted

Matthieu Moy [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

  See 'git help git' for general help about Git.

to the output of "git help"?

...
That sounds like a good direction to go in.

My earlier attempt, and Junio's reply
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/217352

Yeah, I threw "git help git" in the general category of "git help
<cmd>" in that message, and now I realize that it may arguably be
confusing to some people.

Perhaps spend one more line to do something like this?

    'git help -a' and 'git help -g' lists available subcommands and
    concept guides. See 'git help <command>' or 'git help <concept>'
    to read about a specific subcommand or concept.
    For an overview, see 'git help git'.

I am neutral between the above and this:

    For an overview, see 'git help git'.
    'git help -a' and 'git help -g' lists available subcommands and
    concept guides. See 'git help <command>' or 'git help <concept>'
    to read about a specific subcommand or concept.

Hrm?