Re: [PATCH] git-push.txt: mention about remote.*.push when no refspec is given

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

I agree that saying what it is, what it does or what it is for
upfront (i.e. "Specifies what are pushed") before how it is spelled
is an improvement.  I however think describing "If not specified"
here was a mistake, and you are making it worse by burying the
description of what happens when <refspec>... are missing in the
middle of the description for <refspec>...

I would rather see this done in the direction the attached "how
about doing it this way" patch illustrates.  The way how "where" and
"what" are determined when the command line does not specify is the
proparty of the entire command, not of an individual parameter.

I agree your patch looks better than mine. Put it on 'pu', perhaps?
-- 
Duy