Re: feature suggestion: improve rerere
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:19
Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
++<<<<<<< ours
+ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ ssize_t ret, done = 0;
+
+retry:
+ ret = read(fd, buf + done, count - done);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ done += ret;
+
+ if (ret == 0 /* EOF */ || done == count)
+ return done;
+ else
+ goto retry;
+}
+
++||||||| base
++=======
+ #include "common.h"
+
++>>>>>>> theirs
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len;
This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs
exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution
recorded for the first conflict here.
Sounds sensible?Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's default conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra ||||| line. -- Hannes