Re: [PATCH] diff: Fix rename pretty-print when suffix and prefix overlap
From: Antoine Pelisse <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:15
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Antoine Pelisse [off-list ref] writes:quoted
When considering a rename for two files that have a suffix and a prefix that can overlap, a confusing line is shown. As an example, renaming "a/b/b/c" to "a/b/c" shows "a/b/{ => }/b/c".This would be vastly more readable if it had "It should show XXX instead" somewhere in the description, perhaps at the end of this sentence. It can also be after "thus the { => }" below, but I think giving the expected output earlier would be more appropriate.
Good catch, this would probably be better:
When considering a rename for two files that have a suffix and a prefix
that can overlap, a confusing line is shown. As an example, renaming
"a/b/b/c" to "a/b/c" shows "a/b/{ => }/b/c", instead of "a/b/{ => b}/c"
quoted
Currently, what we do is calculate the common prefix ("a/b/"), and the common suffix ("/b/c"), but the same "/b/" is actually counted both in prefix and suffix. Then when calculating the size of the non-common part, we end-up with a negative value which is reset to 0, thus the "{ => }".In this example, the common prefix would be "a/b/" and the common suffix that does not overlap with the prefix part would be "/c", so I am imagining that "a/b/{ => b}/c" would be the desired output?
Yes, at least that's what I expected.
This is a really old thinko (dating back to June 2005). I'll queue the patch on maint-1.7.6 (because 1.7.6.6 is slightly more than one year old while 1.7.5.4 is a lot older) to allow distros that issue incremental fixes on top of ancient versions of Git to pick up the fix if they wanted to. Perhaps we would want to add a few tests?
I can easily understand why that was missed. I will try to resubmit with tests very soon.