Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] fixup! graph: output padding for merge subsequent parents

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:08

John Keeping [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:42:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
John Keeping [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Perhaps it's best to leave the patch as it originally was to guarantee
that we can't get stuck in graph_show_commit(), even when it's called at
an unexpected time, but I see you've already squashed this change in.

Would you prefer me to resend the original patch or send an update with
this change and the above reasoning in the commit message?
Yes, please.  Let's have the original (I think I have it in my
reflog so no need to resend it) and this update on top as a separate
patch with an updated log message.
I was suggesting dropping the change to remove the
graph_is_commit_finished() check in the loop.  I'm not sure it buys us
much and there are still situations that could result in the state
changing to PADDING during the loop if the graph API is used in an
unexpected way.
OK, so the fixup! was not done with enough thought.  I am fine with
dropping it.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help