Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC/PATCH] shell: allow 'help' command to disable interactive shell

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:07

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
How about this?

A patch on top could change the default "git-shell-commands is not
present" message if that seems worthwhile.
Hmph.

I wonder if rewording the message when git-shell-commmands directory
is not there may be a better first step (which actually could be the
last step)?
Maybe, but it's not a step that I'm interested in.  I don't think it
changes the desirability of the patch I sent.  They are independent.
What I thought I read in the log message was that you wanted to give
a better message telling the users that the site does _not_ allow an
interactive shell access.  I do not see how that is independent from
a message given from this codepath, where the side has forbidden
shell access by not having ~/git-shell-commands directory in the
first place.  Are you shooting for customizability?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help