Re: [PATCH] Verify Content-Type from smart HTTP servers

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 07:56:08AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Is it worth having a strbuf_set* family of functions to match the
strbuf_add*? We seem to have these sorts of errors with strbuf from time
to time, and I wonder if that would make it easier (and more readable)
to do the right thing.

Possibly.

The callsite below may be a poor example, though; you would need the
_reset() even if you change the _addstr() we can see in the context
to _setstr() to make sure later strbuf_*(type) will start from a
clean slate when !t anyway, no?

Ah, true. Let's not worry about it, then.

-Peff