Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Hiding refs

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:03

Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] writes:
On 02/05/2013 09:33 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
quoted
Michael Haggerty wrote:
quoted
I would again like to express my discomfort about this feature, which is
already listed as "will merge to next".  Frankly, I have the feeling
that this feature is being steamrolled in before a community consensus
has been reached and indeed before many valid points raised by other
members of the community have even been addressed.  For example:
In $dayjob I work with Gerrit, so I think I can start to answer some
of these questions.
quoted
* I didn't see a response to Peff's convincing arguments that this
should be a client-side feature rather than a server-side feature [1].
The client can't control the size of the ref advertisement.  That is
the main motivation if I understood correctly.
Not according to Junio [4]:

  Look at this as a mechanism for the repository owner to control the
  clutter in what is shown to the intended audience of what s/he
  publishes in the repository.  Network bandwidth reduction of
  advertisement is a side effect of clutter reduction, and not
  necessarily the primary goal.
See my response to Jonathan.
Hiderefs creates a "dark" corner of a remote git repo that can hold
arbitrary content that is impossible for anybody to discover but
nevertheless possible for anybody to download (if they know the name of
a hidden reference).
That is why allow-tip-sha1-in-want is a separate opt-in feature only
the server side controls.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help