Re: [RFC] Should "log --cc" imply "log --cc -p"?

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

  git log --cc --stat

the "--cc" is significant. So I don't think it is right for "--cc" to
always imply "-p". But if the rule kicked in only when no other format
had been specified, that might make sense.

Yes, it was my mistake that I left it unsaid.  Obviously the
description of the "minor irritation" must be qualified with "unless
no other output options like --raw, --stat, etc. are given".

Thanks.