Re: [PATCH v2] branch: show rebase/bisect info when possible instead of "(no branch)"

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Yeah, I do not think "bisecting other" alone makes much sense.

What does "other" refer to when you start your bisection at a
detached head?  I personally think "other" has _any_ value in that

s/_any_/_no_/; obviously ;-)

message, because "(no branch, bisecting)" gives the same amount of
information, especially because "other" does not say which branch it
refers to at all.