Re: [PATCH 4/6] introduce a commit metapack
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:57
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:08:08AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
In order to reduce the disk footprint and I/O cost, the future direction for this mechanism may want to point into an existing store of SHA-1 hashes with a shorter file offset, and the .idx file could be such a store, and in order to move in that direction, you cannot avoid tying a metapack to a pack.Have you considered if we can extend the .idx format version 2 without actually having to bump the version number? My quick reading of check_packed_git_idx() tells me that we have a gap after the "large offset table" that we can place extensions, but I may be mistaken. If we indeed can, then perhaps adding a series of 4-byte "id" header 4-byte extension length (or 8-byte) ... N-byte worth of extension data ... followed by 20-byte SHA-1 checksum of all the extension sections 8-byte file offset to the first extension section
I considered it, but didn't look into it closely. My feeling was that it added extra complexity, without adding any real advantage that a separate file would not.
From this:
Then it will be very natural for the extension data that store the commit metainfo to name objects in the pack the .idx file describes by the offset in the SHA-1 table.
I guess your argument is that putting it all in the same file makes it more natural for there to be a data dependency.
As we always say, .idx is a local cache and bumping its version is not a huge headache compared to other longer term storage items.
True, but it is even less headache if the file is totally separate and optional. -Peff