Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] push: update remote tags only with force
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:50
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
... The problem there is not "already exists" but rather "a blob is not something that can fast-forward". Using the existing REJECT_NONFASTFORWARD is insufficient (because later code will recommend pull-then-push, which is wrong). So I'd be in favor of creating a new error status for it.
Very well said. Please make it so ;-) or should I?