Re: git interactive rebase 'consume' command

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Stephen Kelly [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

One scenario is something like this:

 Start with a clean HEAD (always a good idea :) )
 hack hack hack
 make multiple commits
 realize that a hunk you committed in an early patch belongs in a later
 one. use git rebase -i to fix it.

Is that more clear?

Not really.

I think there are other scenarios, but I guess this won't happen anyway.

Thanks,

Steve.