Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC] git rm -u

From: Antoine Pelisse <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:49

I think `git add -u` would be closer. It would stage removal of files,
but would not stage untracked files.
It would stage other type of changes though.

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Tomas Carnecky
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:35:18 -0500, Eric James Michael Ritz [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hello everyone,

I am thinking about implementing a feature but I would appreciate any
feedback before I begin, because more experienced Git developers and
users may see some major problem that I do not.

Earlier today I deleted a file from a repository.  I deleted it
normally, not by using `git rm`.  So when I looked at `git status` on
my terminal it told me about the file no longer being there.  In my
sleepy state of mind I ran `git rm -u` without thinking about.  I did
this because I have a habit of using `git add -u`.  I know `git rm`
does not support that option, but I tried it anyways without thinking
about it.

When I came to my senses and realized that does not work I began to
wonder if `git rm -u` should exist.  If any deleted, tracked files are
not part of the index to commit then `git rm -u` would add that change
to the index.  This would save users the effort of having to type out
`git rm <filename>`, and could be useful when a user is deleting
multiple files.

Does this sound like a reasonable, useful feature to Git?  Or is there
already a way to accomplish this which I have missed out of ignorance?
Any thoughts and feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Does `git add -A` do what you want?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help