From: Martin von Zweigbergk <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:46
I suppose this was meant for everyone. Adding back the others.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Holding, Lawrence (NZ)
[off-list ref] wrote:
Maybe use *argv instead of argv[0]?
Sure. Everywhere? Also in the lines added in patch 17/19 that refer to
both argv[0] and argv[1], such as "argv[1] &&
!get_sha1_treeish(argv[0], unused)"? Or is this just a sign that I'm
making the code _more_ confusing to those who are more familiar with
C?