Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] Improve documentation and comments regarding directory traversal API
From: Adam Spiers <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:40
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:54:19PM +0000, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Adam Spiers [off-list ref] writes:quoted
diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c index ee8e711..89e27a6 100644 --- a/dir.c +++ b/dir.c@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ * This handles recursive filename detection with exclude * files, index knowledge etc.. * + * See Documentation/technical/api-directory-listing.txt + * * Copyright (C) Linus Torvalds, 2005-2006 * Junio Hamano, 2005-2006 */@@ -476,6 +478,10 @@ void add_excludes_from_file(struct dir_struct *dir, const char *fname) die("cannot use %s as an exclude file", fname); } +/* + * Loads the per-directory exclude list for the substring of base + * which has a char length of baselen. + */ static void prep_exclude(struct dir_struct *dir, const char *base, int baselen) { struct exclude_list *el;@@ -486,7 +492,7 @@ static void prep_exclude(struct dir_struct *dir, const char *base, int baselen) (baselen + strlen(dir->exclude_per_dir) >= PATH_MAX)) return; /* too long a path -- ignore */ - /* Pop the ones that are not the prefix of the path being checked. */ + /* Pop the directories that are not the prefix of the path being checked. */The "one" does not refer to a "directory", but to an "exclude-list".No, if that was the case, it would mean that multiple exclude lists would be popped, but that is not the case here (prior to v4).
Sorry, I meant prior to v3 11/19.
quoted
Pop the ones that are not for parent directories of the path being checkedBetter would be: Pop the entries within the EXCL_DIRS exclude list which originate from directories not in the prefix of the path being checked. although as previously stated, the v4 series I have been holding off from submitting (in order not to distract you from a maint release) actually changes this behaviour so EXCL_DIRS becomes an exclude_group of multiple exclude_lists, one per directory. So in v4, multiple exclude_lists *will* be popped. I'll tweak the comment in v4 to make this clear.
Again, I got confused and forgot that I already included the switch to exclude_list_groups as v3 11/19. But since the patch being discussed here is v3 02/19 which precedes it, everything I said still applies.