Re: cvsps, parsecvs, svn2git and the CVS exporter mess

Eric S. Raymond wrote:

Michael Haggerty wants me to trust that cvs2git's analysis stage has
been fixed, but I must say that is a more difficult leap of faith when
two of the most visible things about it are still (a) a conspicuous
instance of interface misdesign, and (b) documentation that is careless and
incomplete.

For what it's worth, I use cvs2git quite often.  I've found it to work
well and its code to be clear and its developers responsive.  But I
don't mind if we disagree, and multiple implementations to explore the
design space of importers doesn't seem like a terrible outcome.

Thanks for your work,
Jonathan