On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Felipe Contreras
[off-list ref] wrote:
Couple of facts first:
a) This code was already merged
b) This code is for a test
c) I'm the only developer so far
quoted
Cruft in the codebase is a problem for git *developers* because it makes
the code harder to maintain and extend.
A problem big enough to warrant the rejection of the patch series? No.
May I suggest you maintain remote-bzr as a separate project? You have
total control that way without anyone's disagreeing with you. So you
may be more productive and we have less of these emails back and
forth. And speaking from someone whose series may take months to get
in, why the rush?
--
Duy