Junio C Hamano wrote:
Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Of course, transport-helper shouldn't even be specifying the negative
(^) refs, but that's another story.
Hrm, I am not sure I understand what you mean by this.
How should it be telling the fast-export up to what commit the
receiving end should already have the history for (hence they do not
need to be sent)? Or are you advocating to re-send the entire
history down to the root commit every time?
I think Felipe has mentioned before that he considers it the remote
helper's responsibility to keep track of what commits have already
been imported, for example using a marks file.
Never mind that others have said that that's not the current interface
(I don't yet see why it would be a good interface after a transition,
but maybe it would be). Still, hopefully that clarifies the intended
meaning.
Hope that helps,
Jonathan